Small Molecules, Big Differences

Posted on 27 Mar, 2017 by Stacy Krueger-Hadfield

Mary Latimer wrote this post as a final project for Stacy Krueger-Hadfield’s Science Communication course at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. She is a third year PhD student at UAB studying miRNAs and methionine restriction. Her hobbies include cats, netflix, and coffee. You can find out more about her research here.

Genes that deal with stress, growth, and even reproduction are tightly regulated by a number of mechanisms. Micro-RNAs (miRs) are one of these mechanisms.
Continue reading →

Posted in bioinformatics, blogging, evolution, genomics, natural history, next generation sequencing, RNAseq | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Friday Action Item: Try something new

Posted on 24 Mar, 2017 by Jeremy Yoder

An iris grows in Kitsilano. (jby)


On Fridays while the current administration is in office we’re posting small, concrete things you can do to help make things better. Got a suggestion for an Action Item? E-mail us!
Across much of the continental U.S., climate-changed spring is in the air. The president’s flagship legislative project is imploding. (Though it could really use an assist if you haven’t already). Has it really been more than two months? (Yes, it has.)
This is as good a time as any to remember that we’re in this for the long haul. One way to make that haul more bearable: vary the pace and the route. So your Action Item for this week is to try something new. Anything, really, to vary your routine and help freshen your energy. Find a new place for your next run, if you want to take my metaphor about pace and route literally. Break in a new analysis method. Fire up a new podcast while you code. (May I suggest this one? Or this one? Maybe this one? Or even this one?) Stop by a new coffee shop for your morning cup, or make a new recipe for dinner. Maybe try a colorful new (to you) reality show that starts a new season this very night, or have a quieter evening with a new book.
Go forth and refresh yourself, however you most like. Tomorrow’s a new day.

Posted in Action Item | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Polyploidy in the era of GBS

Posted on 23 Mar, 2017 by Stacy Krueger-Hadfield

Ploidy, dear reader, is something that I think about literally all the time. It impacts every facet of my research from the field to the bench to the stats used to analyze data sets. It’s been simultaneously the greatest and the worst aspect underlying the majority of my work thus far.
Anyone who deals with things more complicated than a diploid understands the difficulty. We absolutely have to correctly distinguish individuals with different ploidy levels if we want to accurately genotype and estimate allele frequencies in population genetic studies. Diploidized haploids don’t reflect the true allele frequencies, nor do tetraploids that are treated as diploids.
State-of-the-art ploidy-ing techniques includes flow cytometry (FCM) that determines ploidy level by quantifying nuclear content. There are now high-throughput FCM techniques as well as methods for dried tissue. The downside is that these techniques require the right instrumentation and sufficient tissue. This might not be available if tissue is poorly preserved or limited.
Microsatellites have also been used to determine ploidy. Haploids should have one allele, diploids should have two alleles and polyploids more. However, ploidy detection depends entirely upon the population allelic richness, the numbers of loci and genotyping error.
Recently, hight throughput sequencing has joined the ploidiers toolkit. Sequence data can be used to  determine allelic copy numbers and ploidy levels, but often these approaches are for high coverage data sets (10x to 50x, for example, see Gompert and Mock 2017 that review these recent approaches).
Such high coverage isn’t the norm when GBS is used to assess population-level genetic variation. We sacrifice coverage for lots and lots of individuals (i.e., 2x). If we go as low as we can go for a GBS study, can we detect individual ploidy levels?
Continue reading →

Posted in bioinformatics, evolution, genomics, haploid-diploid, Molecular Ecology, the journal, natural history, plants, speciation | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Molting on the molecular level: how blue crabs become soft-shell crabs

Posted on 21 Mar, 2017 by Stacy Krueger-Hadfield

Megan Roegner wrote this post as a final project for Stacy Krueger-Hadfield’s Science Communication course at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Megan spent her early years in Cape Town, South Africa playing in the tidal pools along the coast and developing a fascination for marine invertebrates. After moving to the United States, Megan attended UAB and is currently working on her PhD in the endocrinology of blue crabs. She hopes to spend her career working to preserve natural habitats and populations of marine invertebrates through better understanding of their interactions with their environments.

During molting season, blue crabs shed their hard outer shells, and, for less than a day, they are left with only a soft shell and a limp body. When hauled in by fisherman, they are immediately sold to eager foodies and restaurants alike.

With its outer shell so soft, the crab can be eaten in its entirety, with no complicated tools to claw your way to the meat.  Soft-shell crab is so well loved that demand is constantly increasing, and, unsurprisingly, supply is dwindling.  Overfishing has led to the collapse of many fisheries and a serious reduction in natural populations.

But, could there be better ways to control molting? Can we figure out what’s going on at the molecular level?

Continue reading →
Posted in bioinformatics, blogging, conservation, domestication, evolution, genomics, natural history | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Hybridization and adaptive radiations

Posted on 20 Mar, 2017 by Reid Brennan

As an iconic system in evolutionary biology, I’ve always been interested in African cichlids and the origins of their diversity1. These cichlids represent an adaptive radiation; they’ve evolved rapidly from a single origin to exploit and speciate into open niches (for a general overview of adaptive radiations, see Losos 2010). In the Great Rift Valley in East Africa, over 2,000 species of cichlids are present. In Lake Victoria region alone, there are more than 700 species that have evolved in only 150,000 years. The amount of diversity and the rate at which it has been generated is really quite incredible.
The cichlid adaptive radiations have received lots of attention, but it is still somewhat unclear how enough genetic variation could be present to generate the huge numbers of species so rapidly. More generally, how could one species possess the necessary variation to result in such diverse niche use?
There are two related, but distinct hypotheses concerning hybridization may explain the generation of diversity in African Cichlids. The first is that hybridization between two species may seed an adaptive radiation and provide the genetic variation necessary for the subsequent radiation events. That is, this initial hybridization event serves as the source of the entire radiation. Another idea is the “syngameon hypothesis”, which argues that hybridization between closely related lineages (i.e., incipient species in the adaptive radiation) can generate genotypes that allow previously unoccupied fitness peaks to be reached. The occasional hybridization between radiating lineages can then continue to facilitate the occupation of novel fitness peaks (Seehausen 2004 provides a thorough discussion of these topics).
Continue reading →

Posted in adaptation, evolution, genomics, next generation sequencing, population genetics, speciation | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Friday Action Item: The budget proposal

Posted on 17 Mar, 2017 by Jeremy Yoder

“Let us beat our swords into ploughshares,” a sculpture at the United Nations Headquarters in New York that is precisely the opposite of the Trump Administration’s proposed Federal budget — which, yes, would cut the US contribution to the United Nations. (Flickr: United Nations Photo)


*On Fridays [while the current administration is in office](http://www.molecularecologist.com/2016/11/road-ahead/) we’re posting small, concrete things you can do to help make things better. Got a suggestion for an Action Item? [E-mail us](jbyoder+tme_action@gmail.com)!*
If you so much as glanced at Science Twitter in the last 48 hours, you know that the administration has released an outline of its proposed Federal budget for the next fiscal year, and it’s [catastrophic](https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/15/us/politics/budget-epa-state-department-cuts.html). To pay for an utterly unnecessary $54 billion funding boost to the world’s biggest military and still come in smaller than the previous year, the proposal includes unprecedented cuts to agencies and programs that affect us all — it slashes international development and diplomatic work at the State Department, it would entirely eliminate the foundational cultural and educational work of the [National Endowment for the Arts](https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2017/03/what-eliminating-the-arts-and-humanities-endowments-would-really-mean/519774/) and the [Corporation for Public Broadcasting](https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/16/business/media/corporation-for-public-broadcasting-cuts.html), and, as though striving for cartoonish callousness, cuts all funds to the Meals on Wheels food-assistance program. [Damage to scientific agencies would include](http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/03/trumps-first-budget-analysis-and-reaction) a 21% cut from the USDA, 12% from the Department of the Interior, 20% from NIH, and 31% from the EPA. (There’s no specific number for NSF, which may or may not be comforting.)
The good news is, this is all only a proposal. Congress, not the President, defines the final budget, and members of Congress in both parties are [raising objections to the proposal already](https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/16/us/politics/budget-republicans-democrats.html). Scuttlebutt on Twitter is that many of them are aware that [the entire budget proposal is a non-starter](https://twitter.com/DrRachaelF/status/842474443054235650), but they can use all the spine-stiffening we can give them. You know [the drill](http://www.molecularecologist.com/2017/01/friday-action-item-put-your-members-of-congress-on-speed-dial/), I trust.

Posted in Action Item, politics, United States | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Deep in the meadow, under the … seagrass, a bed of temporally stable diversity?

Posted on 16 Mar, 2017 by Stacy Krueger-Hadfield

Genetically diverse populations are often more stable and productive. For habitat-forming organisms, such as seagrasses, this results in increased habitat complexity and more abundant associated communities (e.g., Hughes and Stachowicz 2004, Reusch et al. 2005). 
Spatial patterns of genetic diversity have then be used to infer spatial variation in functioning. This relies on the assumption that genetic diversity is stable over time.  But are estimates of population history, connectivity and the ecological significance of these patterns reliable? Are they temporally stable?
Continue reading →

Posted in adaptation, community ecology, conservation, evolution, phylogeography, population genetics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Dishing out Art: “Soiling” our microbiology curriculum

Posted on 14 Mar, 2017 by Stacy Krueger-Hadfield

Sarah Adkins wrote this post as a final project for Stacy Krueger-Hadfield’s Science Communication course at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. She is a MS student working with Dr. Jeffrey Morris at UAB. They are looking at how microbes (i.e., phytoplankton and E. coli) change through long-term evolution in order to better understand their ecology. Her research integrates microbial eco-evolution with interdisciplinary approaches to art and science education. With Dr. Morris, she is testing the effectiveness of new scientific inquiry and art models in the science classroom, building on her background in biology (BS Integrative Biology) and art (BA Studio Art). If you start making your own Petri Dish art, share it with us @petridishartuab on Instagram or use #petridishartuab.

What would the world be like with only red, yellow and blue?
Can you imagine a world without purple, orange, and green?

Fleming’s original plate which shows the antibiotic resistance between Penicillium and Staphylococcus. © A. Fleming


Just like primary colors, academic disciplines can only get us so far.  Crossing disciplines, like mixing colors, can open up vibrant new possibilities.  For example, Alexander Fleming’s artistic thoughtfulness while studying microbial ecology in a Petri dish enabled him to detect antibiotic resistance, and, thus, discovered penicillin, the first antibiotic. This discovery is a striking example of how blending disciplines pushes our collective science knowledge forward.
So, how can we invite young scientists into that same art of discovery in order to encourage them to become scientific innovators?
Continue reading →

Posted in blogging, Coevolution, evolution, methods, microbiology, natural history, selection | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Friday Action Item: Tell Congress to protect environmental science funding

Posted on 10 Mar, 2017 by Jeremy Yoder

“Mary Workman Holds A Jar of Undrinkable Water That Comes from Her Well, and Has Filed A Damage Suit Against the Hanna Coal Company.” — a photo taken by Erik Calonius as part of an early EPA project to document the country before modern environmental regulations took effect, highlighted by the Discover EPA Twitter feed. (Flickr: US National Archives)


*On Fridays [while the current administration is in office](http://www.molecularecologist.com/2016/11/road-ahead/) we’re posting small, concrete things you can do to help make things better. Got a suggestion for an Action Item? [E-mail us](jbyoder+tme_action@gmail.com)!*
In the last week, supporters of science have seen some of our worst fears about the election of Donald Trump become a lot more concrete. The Trump administration released a budget outline proposing to boost military spending by $54 billion, paid for by cuts to virtually every other element of discretionary domestic spending. Specifics are still trickling out, but they already include big proposed cuts to crucial scientific work.
Under the proposals seen so far, the climate- and weather-monitoring National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration will lose [17% of its budget](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/03/03/white-house-proposes-steep-budget-cut-to-leading-climate-science-agency/), including to its satellite network. There’s also proposed cuts accounting for [up to 30%](https://qz.com/925729/leaked-document-details-trumps-epa-budget-cut-plan/) of the budget of the Environmental Protection Agency, [including](http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2017/03/here_are_42_of_president_donal.html) thousands of staff jobs, air and water monitoring, research funding, and education. Thursday a twenty-four-year veteran EPA administrator, who helped start the agency’s environmental justice work under the President Bush, [resigned](https://insideclimatenews.org/news/09032017/epa-environmental-justice-mustafa-ali-flint-water-crisis-dakota-access-pipeline-trump-scott-pruitt) in protest over the proposed elimination of that program.
The good news, for now, is that all of this is proposed — it has to go through Congress, and Congress is [already raising objections](https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/trump-is-headed-for-a-budget-battle/518454/). So this is a great time to [call up your Representative and Senators](http://www.molecularecologist.com/2017/01/friday-action-item-put-your-members-of-congress-on-speed-dial/) and tell them how you feel about the loss of research funding, environmental monitoring, and protection against pollution. A lot of the points you might have used to protest the earlier [freeze on EPA research funding will apply here](http://www.molecularecologist.com/2017/01/tuesday-action-item-help-thaw-the-epa-freeze/):
– Call a local office if you can, rather than Washington, DC and identify yourself as a constituent.
– If you’re a scientist, say so, and if your research relies on EPA or NOAA funding or data, say that too.
– Identify work by the agencies that impacts your local community, which could be anything from environmental cleanup to hurricane monitoring.
As ever, calling a Member of Congress is helpful *even if you think you already know the Member’s position*. If they’re on the wrong side, it’s good for them to hear directly from constituents who disagree. It [*does*](http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/01/03/reps_say_phone_calls_prompted_ethics_reversal.html) make a [difference](http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/06/what-calling-congress-achieves).

Posted in Action Item, funding, politics, United States | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Have we got the power?

Posted on 9 Mar, 2017 by Stacy Krueger-Hadfield

Sabrina Heiser wrote this post as a final project for Stacy Krueger-Hadfield’s Science Communication course at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Sabrina grew up in Germany, completed a BSc (Hons) in Marine Biology at Plymouth University (UK) and then lived in Antarctica for 2.5 years working for the British Antarctic Survey. Now, as a PhD student in Dr. Chuck Amsler’s lab at UAB, she is finally able to combine her love for macroalgae and the Frozen Continent, where she is investigating algal population structure and how gene flow shapes the distribution of geographic patterns in physiological traits. Sabrina tweets at @sabrinaheiser.

Genetic diversity is something we all worry about — especially in our rapidly changing climate. We care about species when trying to conserve biodiversity, but that inherently means we also need to care about the historical and contemporary processes that have resulted in the patterns of genetic diversity within that species. Hoban (2014) predicted that simulation software would be increasingly used to address these issues, but is it?
Simulations can help us calculate and maximize the statistical power of a given sampling strategy. We can optimize power by balancing the amount of populations, genetic markers and individuals that are being sampled (Hoban, 2014). Increasing the number of markers used, can drastically decrease the amount of individuals required, for example. This is especially important when studying organisms with limited access due to location or abundance.
But, what about more complicated organisms, like haploid-diploid species?

Continue reading →

Posted in blogging, community ecology, evolution, haploid-diploid, natural history, NSF, population genetics | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment