Subscribe by email
Join 884 other subscribersMeta
Category Archives: science publishing
Do you sign your peer reviews?
Update: The survey is now closed! Thanks to everyone who participated—I’ll post the results soon. Yesterday John Stanton-Geddes e-mailed me and Tim Vines to ask about writing a post, or a series of posts, on the question of whether or … Continue reading
Posted in peer review, science publishing
1 Comment
People behind the Science: Dr. Ruth Shaw
In the second interview for the Molecular Ecologist, we feature Dr. Ruth Shaw from the University of Minnesota (full disclosure, Dr. Shaw was my PhD adviser). Dr. Shaw is currently the Editor-in-Chief of the journal Evolution. In her research, she studies the … Continue reading
#Evol2013: Home from Snowbird
On balance, Snowbird, Utah was a pretty great place to hang out with a whole bunch of biologists for five days. This was my sixth Evolution meeting, and I think it was the first one where I’d just about entirely … Continue reading
Posted in career, conferences, peer review, science publishing
Tagged Evolution 2013
Leave a comment
2012 Impact Factors – Mol Ecol does well, ME Resources blows the roof off
When ME Resources switched to publishing Primer Notes in a summary article back in 2009, I had a strong hunch that our 2012 Impact Factor could go up quite a bit – this is the first year that the IF … Continue reading
A tale of two Dryad submissions
As it happens, the last two scientific papers I’ve had accepted for publication are also the first two papers for which my first-authorial duties included some substantial journal-mandated archiving of supporting data (beyond uploading a handful of DNA sequences to … Continue reading
Posted in data archiving, peer review
Tagged Dryad, genomics, Joshua tree, Medicago HapMap Project, microsatellite, phylogenetics
8 Comments
Mol Ecol's best reviewers
A healthy peer review system is essential for the integrity of science, but the anonymity of the process means that good reviewers seldom get recognition from the broader community. This is particularly a problem for junior researchers trying to get … Continue reading
Best Practices for Scientific Computing…And Molecular Ecology?
Source: http://xkcd.com/292 *Update* Best Practices in Computing has now been published in PLoS Biology! Computers and computational techniques have significantly advanced the molecular ecologist’s toolbox for answering interesting and complex questions about a range of biological systems, model or otherwise. Imagine, … Continue reading
Posted in bioinformatics, data archiving, population genetics, science publishing, software
Tagged Computing
1 Comment
Let's push things forward
We at Molecular Ecology think archiving data at publication is really important, chiefly because it means that all these amazing datasets are preserved for future generations of researchers. Who knows what questions they’ll be asking fifty years from now? (That, … Continue reading
Posted in data archiving, science publishing
Tagged Data Accessibility Statement, Data archiving, Dryad, JDAP
1 Comment
Do famous researchers have biased perceptions of peer review?
I thought some of you would be interested in this: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/02/01/the-famous-grouse-do-prominent-scientists-have-biased-perceptions-of-peer-review/…
Posted in career, community, science publishing
Leave a comment