Nominations open for the 2025 Harry Smith Prize, recognizing early career research published in Molecular Ecology

The editorial board of the journal Molecular Ecology is seeking nominations for the Harry Smith Prize, which recognizes the best paper published in Molecular Ecology or Molecular Ecology Resources in the previous calendar year (2024) by graduate students or early career scholars with no more than five years of postdoctoral or fellowship experience. The prize comes with a cash award of US$1000 and an announcement in the journal and in The Molecular Ecologist.  The winner will also be asked to join a junior editorial board for the journal to offer advice on changing research needs and potentially serve as a guest editor. The winner of this annual prize is selected by the junior editorial board.

The prize is named after Professor Harry Smith FRS, who founded Molecular Ecology and served as both Chief and Managing Editor during the journal’s critical early years. He continued as the journal’s Managing Editor until 2008, and he went out of his way to encourage early career scholars. In addition to his editorial work, Harry was one of the world’s foremost researchers in photomorphogenesis, where he determined how plants respond to shading, leading to concepts such as “neighbour detection” and “shade avoidance,” which are fundamental to understanding plant responses to crowding and competition. More broadly his research provided an early example of how molecular data could inform ecology, and in 2008 he was awarded the Molecular Ecology Prize that recognized both his scientific and editorial contributions to the field.

Please send a PDF of the paper you are nominating, with a short supporting statement (no more than 250 words; longer submissions will not be accepted) directly to molecol.social@gmail.com by Friday 25 April 2025. Self-nominations are encouraged.

Posted in community, Molecular Ecology, the journal | Tagged | Leave a comment

Nominations open for the 2025 Molecular Ecology Prize

From the Molecular Ecology Prize Committee:

We are soliciting nominations for the annual Molecular Ecology Prize.

The field of molecular ecology is young and inherently interdisciplinary. As a consequence, research in molecular ecology is not currently represented by a single scientific society, so there is no body that actively promotes the discipline or recognizes its pioneers. The editorial board of the journal Molecular Ecology therefore created the Molecular Ecology Prize in order to fill this void, and recognize significant contributions to this area of research. The prize selection committee is independent of the journal and its editorial board.

Continue reading
Posted in community, Molecular Ecology Prize, Molecular Ecology, the journal | Tagged | Leave a comment

The creationists are winning. Here’s what we scientists can do about it

Clouds over Life Sciences South at the University of Idaho, where I earned my PhD. (Flickr, jby)

In my first year of graduate school at the University of Idaho, I joined a bunch of my colleagues in the audience of a debate staged between an evolutionary biologist and a creationist. I remember almost nothing of the debate’s specifics. The creationist held up largely by talking past his opponent, and the audience discussion after featured howlers like the suggestion that the almighty intelligent designer had, as an indication of his power, arranged the sun and the moon so they appear to be the same size as viewed from Earth. (They demonstrably do not.) None of it felt particularly threatening. My gang of biologists and biologists-in-training went for drinks afterward at one of the less-fratty bars near campus, in a more or less uniform mood of self-assurance.

Well.

That creationist was on the faculty of a little religious college that had its campus in downtown Moscow, Idaho, within a block of the bar where we were took our after-debate party. The college is one ministry of a church founded in Moscow by the creationist’s brother, in pursuit of an effort to “reconstruct” the U.S. into his vision of theocracy, modeled on the slaveholding Confederate South. That effort is now a nationwide network of home-schoolers, religious schools, and churches — including a congregation that counts among its members the current nominee for Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth.

So much for that self-assurance.

Continue reading
Posted in climate change, community, evolution, modest proposals, politics, Science Communication, United States | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Notes from Asilomar, 2025

A sanderling, Calidris alba, probing the tide line at Asilomar State Beach (jby)

Driving up to Monterey from southern California is lovely enough to make me almost enjoy driving. Highway 1, just two lanes of traffic right at the edge of the continent, pays for its clifftop views of the Pacific with frequent closure for landslides. But even the more inland route of the US-101 highway takes in sweeping ocean views from Ventura to Pismo Beach, interspersed with and then replaced by rolling hills of oak savannah. Even when those give way to pasture and a distressingly large roadside oil field, there’s still the jumbled rocky towers of Pinnacles National Park beckoning (if not visible) from the exit at Soledad — and then you cut of the highway and wind through green farmland and increasingly expensive-looking housing tracts and golf courses until you arrive in the town where John Steinbeck partied with bums and dockworkers and a cantankerous marine biologist most of a century ago, looking out over rocky coast to the wide ocean.

That drive is something of a seasonal ritual for me, thanks to the American Society of Naturalists’ biennial meeting. ASN is perpetually trying to find an alternate location, ideally east of the Mississippi, to host their standalone scientific conference in rotation. But so far no one has come up with a better spot than the Asilomar conference center. It’s a former YWCA campground, with gorgeous Arts and Crafts halls surrounded by comfortable hotel-style lodging, built among dunes studded with Monterey pines and within earshot of the beach. Even in January it’s a great place to “go be biologists” between scientific talks, as ASN President Dan Bolnick exhorted everyone in his welcome address the first night. Deer wander through the conference grounds fearlessly, and warblers flit through the trees. Jogging up the beach trail into town I saw harbor seals, sea lions, and a sea otter; one morning I got out early with my camera and snapped photos of shorebirds foraging in the wet sand at the tide line.

Continue reading
Posted in Coevolution, community, conferences, genomics, natural history | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Some science books for 2024

“Picton Library” (Flickr, Karen)

The Molecular Ecologist receives a small commission for purchases made on Bookshop.org via links from this post.

One minor personal accomplishment I scored this year is that it’s the first year since I started tracking, fully a decade ago, in which I’ve gotten through more than 20 purely extracurricular books. It’s not been easy, between the volume of text I work through as an academic and the propensity of social media to keep me focused on works that are, at most, long-form essays and articles. Still, one in particular thing cracked the code this year, and that was letting myself use audiobooks.

Swapping audiobooks in for podcasts on my running workouts opened up hours of book time every week, from narrative fiction to more science-adjacent stuff. It also turned out to come in handy for fieldwork trips, and I spent a lot of time driving out to the desert with a car-ful of students to survey Joshua tree populations. I signed up for a one-book-a-month membership at Libro.fm, where purchases benefit an independent bookstore of my choice — and which partners with the similarly bookseller-supporting Bookshop.org, where The Molecular Ecologist is an affiliate — and that’s proven to be about right for my consumption rate.

Adding more books to my media rotation has been good for my blood pressure in another year of frequently sad and frustrating and outright frightening news, and it’s put me in touch with some great science communicators. Here are some science books (and one that is at best science-adjacent) that I read or listened to this year, and which are, I think, each well worth your time — and maybe helpful if you’re still filling in the cracks of a holiday gift-giving list.

Continue reading
Posted in book review, community, ecology, fieldwork, natural history, politics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Coming to PAG 32 this January? Join the first-ever Molecular Ecology workshop

Posted on behalf of Loren Rieseburg and Shawn Narum, workshop organizers.

We are pleased to announce the inaugural workshop for Molecular Ecology at the Plant & Animal Genomics (PAG) conference. The field of Molecular Ecology has been revolutionized by advances in genomics and computational biology that have enabled us to test hypotheses that were previously unanswerable. Topics that may be addressed in the workshop include the following: ecological genomics, ecological interactions, molecular adaptation, environmental nucleic acids, behavioural genomics, population and conservation genomics, epigenomics, and speciation and hybridization.

Email your abstract by November 12, 2024 to Loren Rieseberg/Shawn Narum to be considered for an oral presentation (loren.rieseberg@botany.ubc.ca; shawnn@uidaho.edu)

This initial workshop will include four invited speakers plus presentations from contributed speakers. Contributed oral presentations will be selected from abstracts submitted to the workshop by November 12, 2024. This workshop aims to bring together researchers, students, and practitioners in the field to explore how recent advances in genomics and molecular biology can be integrated with theory, concepts, and approaches of organismal biology.

Join us January 14, 2025 (10:30 AM-12:40 PM) in San Diego, CA!

For questions regarding abstracts, please contact Loren Rieseberg (loren.rieseberg@botany.ubc.caor Shawn Narum (shawnn@uidaho.edu).

Posted in community, conferences, conservation, genomics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Molecular natural history: Chickadees

A black-capped chickadee, Poecile atricapillus, outside Westport, Washington. (Flickr, jby)

Molecular Natural History is a series of posts highlighting what population genetic data reveals about some of my favorite organisms. There’s no rhyme or reason to what species I’ll feature for this, beyond the fact that they’ve made me stop and look closer when I see them along a trail or in my neighborhood. If you’d like to write about the molecular natural history of a favorite taxon, why not pitch a guest post?

Step into the woods almost anywhere in North America and odds are good you’ll be met by a welcoming committee of tiny birds darting among the lower branches of the trees, shouting their name at you, chick-a-dee-dee-dee. Chickadees are delightful and accessible birds: proportioned like live, flying Peeps; curious and bold enough to risk visibility when you venture into their territory; happy to put on a show in your backyard for the low low price of unlimited sunflower seeds.

In many parts of the continent, they’re also an introduction to the challenges of bird identification. Starting with my mother’s old Peterson field guide, I followed the novice birder’s classic emotional arc from excitement at being able to name the songbirds and raptors and corvids that flew through our backyard — to the realization that some of those names were much trickier to apply than others. The first of these challenges I remember cracking was the distinction between the black-capped chickadee, Poecile atricapillus, and the Carolina chickadee, P. carolinensis, whose ranges abut in south-central Pennsylvania. Their size, shape, and shading of wings and underparts seemed relatively distinguishable, as did their songs —until I learned that they hybridize.

Continue reading
Posted in birds, natural history | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

FAQ: Should I invent an acronym?

“Moveable type” (Flickr, David DeSandro)

Q. I’m writing a research article, and the text frequently mentions the biological process that is the subject of the article. I’m also worried about exceeding the length limit for the journal I have in mind to send the article. Can I create a nice compact acronym for my favorite biological process? Perhaps … FBP?

A. No!

Q. Are you sure? It would really save me a lot of space.

A. Sorry, the answer is still no!

Q. For an FAQ you sure are down on acronyms.

A. That’s right, I am. And thank you for pointing out the critical issue here: you knew what “FAQ” stands for long before you arrived here. It’s not a barrier to reader comprehension; people will simply absorb it and move on to the Qs and As.

In contrast, if you create an acronym from whole cloth for use in your paper, readers won’t be familiar with it. They’ll have to do the extra cognitive work of remembering what the acronym means. If the acronym stands for the process that’s the subject of the paper, that means you’ve made it harder for readers to remember what the paper is about. How does that help you communicate what you discovered about that process?

Continue reading
Posted in just for fun, Science Communication, science publishing, teaching | Tagged , | Leave a comment

What do we know about the genetics of “born this way?” — and how does it help us to know it?

(Flickr, karendasuyo)

Not quite five years ago, a collaboration led by researchers at the Broad Institute published what seemed like the last word in “born this way”: a genomic study of same-sex sexual behavior in a cohort of almost half a million people. That project promised to provide, finally, a window into the evolution of human sexual diversity. It demonstrated, about as clearly as we can demonstrate for any behavioral trait, that some element of sexual orientation is inborn — and that the genetic variation underlying human sexual diversity is deeply woven into the history of our species.

Five years later, in the U.S., we’re facing an ongoing wave of state legislation against basic aspects of queer life and culture, from bans on gender-affirming medical care to restrictions targeting drag performances and history lessons. Worldwide, we’ve seen renewed action against sexual and gender minorities, up to and including the imposition of the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality.” We’ve long thought legal protections for sexual and gender diversity flowed logically from the idea that sexual orientation and gender identity are deeply inborn and immutable, in the way that most people understand genetics — so why didn’t a modern genome-wide association study in the pages of Science move the needle?

Continue reading
Posted in evolution, genomics, humans, mini-review | Tagged | Leave a comment

Mini Reviews provide a new format for brief overviews of trending topics

Sometimes you want to introduce an idea or review a topic that doesn’t support an in-depth review of the literature. Molecular Ecology and Molecular Ecology Resources are introducing a new article format that may be what you’re looking for: Mini Reviews. In a joint editorial published online this week, editors Joanna Freeland, Ben Sibbett, and Loren Rieseberg outline plans for the new format, which will be limited to 3,000 words and two display items. They also suggest some examples of Mini Review topics that might be appropriate for each of the sister journals:

  • A new topic or research area for which there is not yet sufficient data for a full review (MEC).
  • A focused overview of a niche topic (MEC).
  • Best practices for a particular technique or analysis (MER).
  • Emerging techniques that have been adopted relatively recently (MER).
  • Older techniques with novel applications (MER).
  • A novel insight or perspective on a topic that has previously been reviewed (MEC).
  • A connection between two or more topics that have previously been addressed in isolation (MEC).
  • The development of a novel hypothesis that could frame future research (MEC).

The journals will accept unsolicited Mini Review submissions through the usual process — just select the Mini Review format when you’re setting it up in Manuscript Central — but the editors encourage pre-submission inquiries, which can be sent to molecol@wiley.com.

Posted in community, Molecular Ecology, the journal, science publishing | Tagged | Leave a comment